Chemist Breaks Down the Ingredients in $54 'Clean' Foundation | WSJ Label Lab


Chemist Breaks Down the Ingredients in $54 'Clean' Foundation | WSJ Label Lab

Clean beauty” does not have a regulated definition. In fact, foundation makeup products often include long labels with names only …

Clean beauty products

#Chemist #Breaks #Ingredients #39Clean39 #Foundation #WSJ #Label #Lab

Acne treatment solutionsAnti-aging skincareAt-home spa treatmentsBeauty myths debunkedBest skincare productsBest supplements for hair growthBest vitamins for skinClean beauty productsCruelty-free beauty brandsDIY beauty treatmentsEffective sunscreen applicationEssential oils for beautyFitness and beauty connectionHealthy hair care routineHealthy lifestyle habitsHolistic health tipsHydrating face masksImportance of hydrationMakeup tips for beginnersMindfulness and beautyNatural beauty tipsNutrition for glowing skinOrganic makeup brandsProfessional skincare treatmentsSeasonal skincare routinesSkin type guideStress relief techniquesTop superfoods for skinVegan skincare optionsWellness trends 2024
Comments (28)
Add Comment
  • @Did.You.Forget

    Well… I don’t trust anything in this video. Sounds like a pushy narrative.

  • @Etiel-Trevino

    Did we forgot to buy the proper product?
    Because y'all reviews the ingredients of one formulation but using a different product😂

  • @jhher4116

    Clear and unbiased review of a product! Pure chemistry ⚗️.

  • @joypecarski3115

    The editor wrote Kelly "Dobbs" in the segment breakdown PS

  • @MNP208

    I am looking for a video explaining cosmetic safety. It's really hard to find. Many brands are marketed as "safe brands". I'm wondering if all cosmetics are safe or if some are better than others. Is it worth spending more money? Are mineral foundations necessarily safer?

  • @snowflake7593

    looks like cosmetics are 99.9% safe to use 😁

  • @Pbdave1092

    EWG really? You cited a scam group instead of the expert in front of you?

  • @sankimalu

    Who came up with this idea? Brilliant!

  • @jakeroege

    Please stop using the EWG for safety references. They are NOT a scientific organization

  • @etutorshop

    What would happen if someone accidentally consumes it ? 😵 Or say if pets ate it?

  • @JoshuaJones-eg2sc

    Cameraperson missed focus in the lab shots… great info, but the visuals are distracting because of the soft focus. They fixed it for a split second near the very end.

  • @TomNook.

    It's great to breakdown the marketing BS

  • @volodymyrv5897

    – What will NATO give to Ukraine?

    -Weapons and money. Akhmetov's team will write off the funds for the bureaucratic needs of the state. officials, and the shells will fly somewhere in the field, they will officially write: "~1000 orcs per day".

    The illusion of controlling the situation. This is an illusion of peace for the west, with which the west is satisfied.

  • @vibhukumar1189

    Pronouncing those chemical may take months if I try

  • @auro1986

    cosmetic chemist kelly breaks down harmful toxic chemicals tested on animals only to get $54 million from ilia

  • @HaHaBIah

    "Aloe is 98% water. Making it a good substitute for… well… WATER"

  • @italianlifestyle7911

    Exactly what I needed these days.. there should be more content on Youtube on clean beauty products❤